LUCY

This content is only partially available in English.

Origins

The following blog posts illustrate the journey from the 2022 “students in the box” student competition, organized by Mainz University of Applied Sciences, to the realization of the interdisciplinary research project LUCY on the Mainz University of Applied Sciences campus on Lucy-Hillebrand-Straße.

 

Outline: Post Titles

1. Project Launch Through a Student Competition

- Background

- Competition Task

- Jury session

 

2. Three concepts win first-place honors

 

3. Collaboration among the winners

“This is something completely new for us—a wonderful project and a rare opportunity

to work on something that will actually be implemented.”

- Energy simulation (master’s students)

- Grid, core, and solid wall sections

- Structural framework and construction

- Timber Construction Seminar – the SPIDER System

 

4. Preliminary design

- Concept and design

- Usage scenarios

- Recipient of the Gutenberg Scholarship from the State Capital of Mainz

 

5. Building Materials

- Retention-photovoltaic green roof

- Screw foundations

- Clay as a building material

- Rammed-earth walls

- Clay brick facing/straw core

- Wood-clay ceiling, Rematter

1. Project Launch Through a Student Competition

Background on the Competition

The project will be launched in the summer semester of 2022. As construction work on the second phase of the university campus progresses, the university administration has expressed a need for additional student study spaces. Student enrollment has risen significantly in recent years, and at the same time, the need for modern teaching and learning spaces has changed. With the second construction phase and additional student study spaces, the Mainz University of Applied Sciences campus is set to further strengthen Mainz as a center of higher education. The university administration’s request is ultimately brought to the university’s Department of Architecture.

As part of Module 1.5, Project 1, Phase 1, the assignment “students in the box” was issued on March 23, 2022, to students in the Bachelor of Engineering in Architecture program. Under the supervision of Prof. Gero Quasten, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Julius Niederwöhrmeier, Prof. Dipl.Ing. Thomas Mrokon, and Prof. Peter Horejs, students will have the opportunity to develop designs throughout the semester.

In addition to serving as the final assignment for the M 1.5 Project 1 Phase 1 module, the assignment also features a student competition. Students enrolled in the module may submit the designs they have developed. The goal of the competition is to select one or more designs as the basis for implementation.

"Students in the Box" Competition Assignment

Another building on the Mainz University of Applied Sciences campus is intended to address the shortage of student workspaces. The space allocation plan to be included in the design consists of approximately 400 m² of learning and work space, technical space, and restroom areas. Key aspects of the building should be sustainability, flexibility, and temporary construction:

• Sustainability: Architects bear a special responsibility regarding resource consumption. The materials used should be chosen wisely. The building must be climate-neutral in both construction and operation to be sustainable.

• Flexibility: The building’s design should allow for free and flexible use to respond to dynamic requirements.

• Temporary construction: Every building has its own life cycle. The reuse of materials and components through thoughtful planning should be possible. This is the only way to avoid waste. The resources used in construction can be efficiently reused.

Jury Meeting

On July 4, 2022, the closed jury meeting will take place in the auditorium of Mainz University of Applied Sciences on Holzstraße. The jury consists of:

Expert judges:

Prof. Günter Pfeifer, Architect, Darmstadt/Freiburg

Prof. Dipl. Ing. M.Arch. Felix Waechter BDA, architect, Darmstadt

Dr.-Ing. Jochen Stahl, structural engineer at Fast+Epp, Darmstadt

Prof. Lutz Büsing, interior architect, Mainz University of Applied Sciences

Deputy Expert Judges/Preliminary Review:

Prof. Gero Quasten, Architect, Mainz University of Applied Sciences

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Julius Niederwöhrmeier, Architect, Mainz University of Applied Sciences

Prof. Dipl.Ing. Thomas Mrokon, Architect, Mainz University of Applied Sciences

Prof. Peter Horejs, Architect, Mainz University of Applied Sciences

Subject-Matter Judges:

Prof. Dr. Susanne Weissman, President of Mainz University of Applied Sciences

Prof. Thomas Giel, Director of Construction, Mainz University of Applied Sciences

Gregor Galic, Department of Engineering, Mainz University of Applied Sciences

Additional/Advisory Members:

Members of the Architecture Student Council

 

After a seven-and-a-half-hour session consisting of two evaluation tours, the jury awarded three designs with the equivalent prize in the first prize category:

 

Johanna Hofmann, Niklas König, and Justus Nixdorf

Text: Niklas König, Johanna Hofmann, architecture students

2. Three concepts are in the top prize category

Concept by Justus Nixdorf

Flexibility means versatility. The building integrates easily, transparently, and openly into various locations and building types. The building’s lack of a fixed orientation allows for flexibility in location and use. The space can be zoned using heavy curtains, furniture, and/or acoustic elements, creating either focused or open spaces.

The open square with its continuous glass facade is compelling for two reasons: The flexibility of the floor plan is hard to beat. The compact core is precisely positioned within the space.

The wraparound sun and glare protection made of recycled fabrics is a successful approach to circularity and reuse concepts. Its colorful combination also conveys a decidedly cheerful and improvised appearance that is very well suited to the purpose of a “student workspace.”

The entire building can be powered by passive solar and geothermal energy in such a way that it can be used in both summer and winter without the need for ventilation or heating systems.

The prefabricated timber construction elements are arranged intelligently: their layout, which balances modular connectivity with design freedom, is compelling; the resulting staggered levels of the covered outdoor areas create a compelling spatial structure that integrates interior and exterior spaces.

The modular construction ensures short assembly times and allows for straightforward dismantling. Canopies, terraces, and the facade are assembled on-site. To counteract additional sealing of green spaces, the building is elevated on screw foundations.

Shifting the base modules creates a clear separation. To the east is a larger area for coworking and group work. The central restroom and entrance wing separates the concentrated study area, located to the west, from this zone.

Movable room divider modules provide storage space and allow for sub-zoning. They can be used to flexibly create temporary spaces.

The limited circulation areas and the building’s well-proportioned form, combined with a playful structural approach, are compelling due to their spatial precision and logical simplicity.

Concept - Johanna Hofmann

A poetically introspective learning space, which can also serve as an exhibition area for student work, is centered around a central atrium. Rainwater is channeled into the atrium’s water basin via the roof’s slope. The flower bed located there improves the microclimate, and the water basin provides pleasant evaporative cooling in the summer. The water basin has an overflow connected to a cistern, which is used for non-potable water.

The open interior features four blocks containing service rooms. The wooden table elements attached all around the post-and-beam facade can be used as workspaces and exhibition areas.

The concept is based on historical typologies of the ancient peristyle house, reinterpreted in a modern, minimalist style. Proposing an inner courtyard with a water basin is, on the one hand, spatially compelling; on the other hand, it allows for simple ventilation with adiabatic cooling. Regarding the exterior appearance, the jury discussed a slightly more nuanced façade with partially enclosed surfaces.

3. Collaboration Among the Winners

Subsequently, the three students work together to develop a preliminary design under the ongoing supervision of Prof. Quasten, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Julius Niederwöhrmeier, and Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Mrokon. Other departments are also brought in to provide support.

Energy Simulation

For example, two students from Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences are participating as part of their master’s thesis and are creating an energy simulation model to evaluate the design from a thermal perspective.

Grid, Core, and Solid Wall Sections

- Various column grids and core sizes examined – 5.00 m specified

- Wall panels added for energy efficiency reasons – wall panel arrangements

Structural System and Design

The roof overhang on all sides and the surrounding, cantilevered exterior of the building quickly emerge as the key structural challenges in the planned timber construction. The structural solutions for the roof and the perimeter will significantly shape the building’s form.

Various design options for the structure and support system are being evaluated, with the requirement that the corner cantilever must always be achieved without the use of concrete.

A timber truss system forms the primary structural framework. These trusses support the cantilever in one direction, while the secondary beams arranged above them enable the cantilever in the other direction.

Wood Construction Seminar – The SPIDER System

Furthermore, as part of a timber construction seminar at the Wasem Monastery in Engelthal in 2023, we will explore solutions and products from the manufacturer Rothoblaas for innovative timber construction.

These include the SPIDER connection and reinforcement system for multi-story timber construction. Typically, BSP panels cannot be supported at specific points on wooden columns due to excessive punching forces. The steel core of the SPIDER system prevents shear failure of the BSP slab, as the system’s arms provide enhanced puncture resistance for the BSP panels, thereby enabling exceptional shear strength values.

The SPIDER system allows for the creation of clear spans exceeding 6.0 x 6.0 m. The dimensions of a single SPIDER unit amount to a total diameter of approximately 90 cm.

After consulting with Rothoblaas as a potential industrial partner, it was ultimately determined that the system is not compatible with our objectives regarding the reversibility of the structural system. The moments at the BSP panel joints would have to be transferred either via rebar ties embedded in a concrete pour or via steel plates embedded in the wooden floor.

 

Text: Johanna Hofmann, Architecture Student

4. Preliminary Design

Concept and Design

An open, transparent structure provides space for student workspaces, exhibitions, and seminars. The building’s wraparound, cantilevered exterior offers seating and establishes a direct connection between the building and its visitors. The flexible, open space can be individually adapted and subdivided depending on usage requirements.

Simple and advanced construction methods allow for dismantling and reassembly at a different location. They also ensure that materials can be easily separated and recycled in the event of demolition. The choice of materials is based on maximizing sustainability.

The floor plan is limited to essential functions. The usable space is located in the outer, well-lit portion of the interior. The 5-meter column grid allows the space to be flexibly divided into any number of areas using curtains. The core of the building is constructed of rammed earth and includes two unisex restrooms, a utility room, and an open kitchenette. The kitchenette can be screened off with a curtain as needed.

Access is provided through two entrance doors, but the building can be entered from all sides. Elements of the glass facade can be opened.

The square floor plan, the identically designed facades, and the wraparound design result in a direction-neutral design. This enhances the building’s interaction with its surroundings, supports the concept of openness, and allows visitors to approach it equally from all sides.

In addition to providing weather protection for the walkway, the roof overhang casts shade and protects the interior from overheating in the summer. In addition, sunshades can be lowered from the roof edge. These are made of a recycled, translucent fabric. They form a “second skin” and also protect the perimeter walkway. This zone serves as the transition between the surroundings and the building.

The building’s wooden structure meets the high standards for sustainable material selection. It is designed to be easily assembled and disassembled and avoids synthetic building materials as much as possible. To avoid further sealing of green spaces, the building is to be constructed on screw foundations. These can be removed without leaving any residue after demolition.

Photovoltaic modules on the roof provide independent energy production. If necessary, excess energy can be fed into the power grid. With the help of natural cross-ventilation and a chimney effect—enhanced by ventilation elements in the roof—the interior can be maintained at a comfortable temperature in the summer. Radiant floor heating, an air-source heat pump, and the thermal mass of the clay ensure heating during colder months.

Text: Niklas König

Use Cases

On March 20, 2023, an interim report will be presented by University President Prof. Dr. Susanne Weissman and University Chancellor Jens Egler during a presentation session. By then, various usage scenarios—including individual study, seminars, lectures, exhibitions, and combinations thereof—will have been developed. This will demonstrate the space’s high degree of flexibility.

In the summer of 2023, the current status of the preliminary design phase will be honored with the Gutenberg Scholarship from the state capital of Mainz.

Text: Johanna Hofmann

5. Building Materials

Retention-Photovoltaic Green Roof

With the goal of achieving the building’s self-sufficiency, the installation of photovoltaic panels on the roof is planned from the outset. In addition to retention areas on the property, the roof surface is also designed to serve as a rainwater retention system.

In addition to traditional benefits, such as improving the microclimate and promoting biodiversity, the retention roof plays a particularly important role in urban contexts: It stores rainwater, which either evaporates gradually or is discharged into the sewer system in a controlled manner. This temporary storage relieves pressure on the sewer system and reduces the risk of flooding, which is becoming increasingly prevalent in urban areas due to high levels of soil sealing and extreme weather events. Over the days following rainfall, the water evaporates gradually through the vegetation and from the substrate, creating evaporative cooling. This reduces the thermal load on the roof surface in summer and also prevents the entire building from heating up as much.

The structure must be designed to withstand increased loads when saturated with water.

When combined with photovoltaics, the retention roof also prevents a drop in PV module performance caused by overheating. As a result, the ambient temperature of green roofs is a maximum of 35°C, while dark asphalt roofs can reach up to 90°C in the summer.

Screw Piles

To avoid further sealing of green spaces, the building is to be constructed on screw piles. These can be removed without leaving any residue after a potential demolition and reused elsewhere. While traditional foundations often require extensive excavation, concrete pouring, and curing times, screw piles can be installed in a short amount of time. The ground suffers significantly less damage than with conventional foundations. Screw piles are typically used for carports, garden sheds, (temporary) structures with low load requirements, or as foundations for renovation projects.

In the summer, the cavity beneath the floor structure should be ventilated to cool the building. The base area must be designed to be air-permeable but rodent-proof. It should be possible to close off the air space in winter to minimize energy loss, as heat loss through the floor structure accounts for a significant portion of the total heat loss in the calculations. To protect the wood from moisture, the air space beneath the wooden structure should be at least 30 cm.

The high loads from the columns must be transferred directly into the screw foundations. A substructure made of steel beams connecting the screw foundations to one another can serve as a solution for load distribution.

The goal is to construct the rammed-earth walls without additional concrete foundations. Load transfer can be achieved, for example, via a steel girder positioned beneath the wall, whereby the rammed-earth wall does not rest directly on the girder (e.g., a solution using a sill block).

Clay as a Building Material

LUCY highlights the future viability of traditional building techniques and their sustainable benefits for architecture. Clay as a building material plays a role right from the start, as it excellently meets ecological and building biology requirements. It is locally available, resource-efficient, low-energy to produce, and fully recyclable. It is also easy to work with and free of harmful substances. It regulates indoor humidity, and its mass acts as a heat reservoir.

Rammed Earth Walls

With its natural texture, the non-load-bearing utility and restroom core made of rammed earth not only lends the interior a warm, inviting atmosphere but also serves as a thermal mass for the building. The mass protects against overheating in the summer by storing heat and releasing it only gradually. As the “heaviest” clay building material, rammed earth achieves bulk densities between 1,700 and 2,200 kg/m³ after compaction and drying.

The skylights planned for the rammed earth wall are intended to further harness the thermal mass of the core by optimizing nighttime cooling. The earth stores the cool air that flows over the wall surfaces at night and slowly releases it into the room.

Similar to monolithic concrete construction, rammed earth is worked using formwork and layer-by-layer compaction. The goal is for students to erect the walls themselves under expert guidance. The time-consuming process of tamping the clay into the formwork layer by layer would become a collaborative effort.

Another guiding principle is circularity. In the event of demolition, the clay walls can be returned to the natural raw material cycle by type if they are removed from their foundations and returned to the meadow.

 

Wood-frame walls with clay brick cladding / straw infill

Due to their differing structural requirements, the exterior walls are to be constructed differently depending on their specific orientation: The east and west facades will be built as wood-frame structures with clay brick cladding; the north and south walls as wood-frame structures with straw-filled partitions. In the east and west, the sun is lower in the sky, resulting in more intense solar radiation on the exterior walls. The clay brick facing has a beneficial effect here due to its high thermal mass.

 

Wood-Clay Ceiling, Rematter

The Swiss-based startup Rematter is industrializing a wood-clay ceiling system that was developed in collaboration with Senn, Herzog & de Meuron, and ZPF Ingenieure for the House of Research, Technology, Utopia, and Sustainability (HORTUS), with the goal of competing with reinforced concrete ceilings.

Compared to reinforced concrete structures, the wood-clay ceiling reduces greenhouse gas emissions by up to 80 percent. The ceiling elements stand out for their high degree of prefabrication. They require no drying time and can be installed immediately. The system meets all requirements for load-bearing capacity, fire resistance, and sound insulation for a partition element in residential or office construction.

The ceiling consists of glue-free solid wood beams filled with rammed earth. All joints are mortised and tenoned or screwed, which allows for easy disassembly and the reusability of all components. The timber frame structure provides the structural support. Compared to the clay, wood is the largest cost factor in the ceiling.

The three-layer panel ensures the stiffening of the ceiling slab and contributes to optimal vibration behavior.

The clay supports only its own weight (through the formation of voids). It provides thermal mass, sound insulation, REI 60 fire resistance, and contributes to a healthy indoor climate. While most timber ceiling systems lack activatable thermal mass, the clay in this timber-beam ceiling offers a decisive advantage.

For LUCY, options are being evaluated from both structural and design perspectives: either aligning the ceiling panels unidirectionally throughout the interior or, alternatively, varying the span direction of the secondary beams from column span to column span to achieve directional neutrality.

 

Text: Johanna Hofmann